.: Above The Aether :.

12 Oct, 2007

How to legally find music online

Posted by: Dave In: Music| Web

Man-o-War: Do these guys rock, or what?

I found a great blog post detailing numerous legal ways to listen to and download music online. From Digital Alchemy via LifeHack:

Free online music used to be like the Wild West of the Internet with services like Napster dominating the field during the bubble. Now, as the Internet has matured, new models for distributing music are coming together.

But who’s going to pay for all this free, legal music? A common answer to this pesky question is advertising, but some justify it as a marketing cost and some are still silent on how exactly they’ll make this “new” business model work.

But the important part is that you can take advantage of their generosity right now by downloading or listening to as much music as you can handle.

There isn’t a music corporation out there that understands how to sell music online in a user-friendly and truly compelling way. (Amazon just nudged ahead of the pack in my opinion with their new digital music store, but they aren’t perfect either).

There are varying degrees of legality, frustration and confusion surrounding the music industry’s conception of how music should be sold and distributed online in this Jetson-esque world we live in. The ridiculous terms & conditions and laughable privacy policies on corporate web servers are idiotic at best (and violations of personal privacy as a worse case scenario).

The concept of a physical medium for music is fading blindingly fast. 8-tracks are only seen in 1970s dream sequences in movies. Cassette tapes are quaint and kitschy like 80’s sit-coms. Vinyl, for some strange reason, is in a trendy resurgence, but still scarce - thanks, in part, to techno DJs. And sales of compact discs are plummeting like our president’s approval rating. Music collections are now measured by the Gigabyte (mine hovers around 40).

The only time I listen to actual CDs is in my vehicle. And the only reason for that is because I don’t have a decent MP3 player installed yet (those wacky radio transmitter gadgets don’t work very well in a city like Houston, filled to the brim with radio waves.)

I would say 80-90% of my music consumption is in digital format. Are mp3s as crisp and vibrant as other formats of music? Probably not. Can I tell the difference? Not really. I just want to rock (like the dudes in Man-O-War from the photo above.)

My entire music collection (several hundred albums) fits onto my iPod with room to spare for contacts, photos, podcasts, notes, etc. I couldn’t imagine carrying a wheel-barrow full of CDs around with me instead of this tiny little device. For convenience alone, digital is the way to go.

What did I do before the iPod? I carried a handful of CDs and a portable CD player when I traveled. It was a pain. Even those little nylon cases didn’t hold more than a few dozen CDs.

What did I do before that? I carried a few 90 minutes mix tapes and a walkman.

What did I do before that? I listened to vinyl albums on our stereo at home and traveled with a small AM/FM radio.

God bless the internet. It has become much easier to find great music; and much easier to wade through the terrible music to find that good music than ever before. So check out all the legal sites where you can download and/or listen to music online legally.

Link (via Lifehack)

- Dave

P.S. - I haven’t even touched upon all the illegal ways you can find music online. But I would never think of partaking in nafarious methods like that. Really.

8 Responses to "How to legally find music online"

1 | Joshua

October 15th, 2007 at 9:19 am

Avatar

Vinyl rules.

2 | Dave

October 15th, 2007 at 9:52 am

Avatar

There’s nothing wrong with vinyl or any other format of music unless you consider the portability problems. Then vinyl becomes a real pain.

Franky, if I owned a bunch of vinyl, I would probably rip it to MP3 and store it digitally anyhow. I know, I know, that would defeat the purpose of vinyl, but I honestly like the convenience more than the slightly warmer sound.

I also think vinyl has become a little more popular than it deserves because it is viewed as trendy and cool. Hipsters, and DJs dig vinyl, so it’s perceived as a pretty cool thing to collect.

How many pairs of horn-rimmed glasses, vintage 80’s t-shirts and courier bags do you see walking around in vinyl shop? Play the counting game some day and see if you can spot the urban hipster.

3 | Joshua

October 15th, 2007 at 11:23 am

Avatar

Analog sound is not “slightly warmer.” It’s generally much, much better.

How about this: the superiority of mp3 to vinyl in terms of convenience is exactly inverse to the inferiority of mp3 to vinyl (analog) in terms of sound.

By the way, being anti-hipster takes just as much effort as being a hipster.

4 | Dave

October 15th, 2007 at 11:54 am

Avatar

I’ll buy your theorem regarding the inverse proportionality of MP3 vs. vinyl in terms of quality. But I still think the importance of MP3 portability outweighs the importance of the quality. If I’m wrong, why does half the planet own iPods but half the planet does not own vinyl? Which is more important (from a technological standpoint) to the majority of the music-buying population? Portability or quality of sound?

I am neither hipster nor anti-hipster, so honestly it doesn’t take much effort to be Dave. It just happens…like bad poetry in a coffee house.

Rock on.

5 | TDH

October 15th, 2007 at 11:28 pm

Avatar

The portability of MP3s is great, but I also don’t buy the argument of the sound being “better” on vinyl. I have vinyl and CD music, popular, jazz, and classical. There is a difference in the sound at times, though much of that seems to come from the original recording technique and quality of the turntable. I can certainly understand preferring vinyl to CD/MP3, but the “better” part is taste.

6 | Dave

October 16th, 2007 at 8:17 am

Avatar

I’ve never had a really great turn-table to take advantage of the warm sound that vinyl fans appreciate. So I associate vinyl to the sounds coming out of my family’s old stereo when I was a child.

I’m honestly basing my “vinyl is warmer” statements on feedback from many other music fans. Because to me, vinyl equals an annoying background hiss and the need to flip the record every 30 minutes.

Does anyone know if the warms sounds of vinyl are preserved when the sound is converted to digital format? Or do you need the sounds originating from the vinyl to get that warmth and richness?

7 | Nathan

October 16th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

Avatar

analog recording and media have more overtones. if you like depth of sound, then they are better, if you’re into shallow sounds, or thin sounds, then digital’s the way to go. plus it’s really a difference between round waves and square waves. analog, round, digital, square. i likes me some overtones and greater harmonics. there’s something to be said for thin sounds though. on the whole i like my sounds to be rich and thick, i mean there’s nothing greater than feeling real music vibrate your ribcage, and move up and down your spine. it really gave me my first experience of nothingness. it’s very meditative. playing music. it’s not the technology, it’s the frickin’ people. all the technology in the world can’t make a descent song. john cage might of said otherwise, but he’s dead, so he ain’t saying much.
give me the intentional experince of listening to music. i don’t need my music to block out the everyday sounds that i enjoy listening to…too. we’ve really shut ourselves off from the outside world. i’m surprised people watch the weather. why?

8 | Dave

October 16th, 2007 at 7:07 pm

Avatar

The weather is more interesting than 90% of what passes for television these days.

Two words - reality TV.

Comment Form


  • Dave L: quick! get me a holy hand grenade! ... awww, dammit, late to the party again. I still want my nerd points.
  • Dave L: I, for one, welcome our new crab overlords ...
  • Jamie: Cracking. Up. Also, Catching. Up. :)
  • Dave: Latest comments are a click away.
  • Nathan: I can not read recently posted comments at a glance. What happened to that function?
  • Jim Thompson: This list does not include Venezuelan Beaver Cheese, which *must* be on any stinky cheese list in spite of it being a made up cheese. Please contact t
  • epiphenita: where's the freakin gorgonzola? that stuff is pretty smelly. and good. i plan on test-driving some of these stinky french cheeses in the fall. will re
  • Nathan: Where can I aggressively vote my indifference?
  • Scott: I'm not sure, really. This version is easier to read and navigate, but it seems more sterile to me somehow.
  • Dave: Da slow blade stabs the shield, kthxbye!

About

This is an example of a WordPress page, you could edit this to put information about yourself or your site so readers know where you are coming from.

 

October 2007
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031